What point does Rachels intend to make with his example of Jones letting his cousin drown in the bathtub?
Rachels argues that killing someone is not necessarily morally worse than letting that person die. According to Rachels, passively watching a child drown in a bathtub is the moral equivalent of murder. The decision to let someone die, Rachels argues, is a type of action that is subject to moral appraisal.
What does James Rachels think of the American Medical Association’s position on euthanasia?
Rachels challenges the conventional view that passive euthanasia is permissible but active euthanasia is not. This view is endorsed by the American Medical Association in a 1973 statement. But Rachels holds that in some cases active euthanasia is morally preferable to passive euthanasia on utilitarian grounds.
What is Steinbock’s criticism of Rachels?
Steinbock believes that Rachels has misinterpreted the statement of the American Medical Association on euthanasia. Steinbock believes that in a few situations it is acceptable for a doctor to intentionally terminate a patient’s life.
Which of the following best reflects Steinbock’s interpretation of the American Medical Association’s AMA statement on euthanasia?
Which of these best reflects Steinbocks interpretation of the American Medical Association’s (AMA) statement on euthanasia? The AMA forbids all euthanasia but may allow doctors to stop using extraordinary means to prolong life.
Which of the following best characterizes Rachels argument?
Which of the following best characterizes Rachels’s argument? Both active and passive euthanasia involve the intentional termination of a human life with dignity-therefore, both are morally wrong.
How do both Rachels and Steinbock define passive euthanasia?
In this essay, Rachel ‘s begins by giving his own definition of passive euthanasia saying that it is taking the action of ending or withholding the necessary medical actions to keep someone alive who is otherwise going to die without it.
What does Steinbock say about the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means in the AMA doctrine?
The AMA statement allows the cessation of the employment of extraordinary means. to prolong life. Steinbock says it is a mistake to identify the cessation of extraordinary means. with passive euthanasia.
What is the point of Rachel’s example of the injured pianist and false friend meant to prove?
What point are Rachels’s examples of the injured pianist and false friend meant to prove? Happiness is not the only thing that is good in and of itself; other things, such as talent and friendship, are also good in and of themselves.
Are we obligated to use extraordinary means to prolong life?
In assessing when there is a duty to preserve life, the Church distinguishes between ordinary and extraordinary means. [1] Ordinary means must be taken to preserve life, and extraordinary means can be morally refused.
Why does Rachels think there is no moral difference between active and passive euthanasia?
Rachels argues that active euthanasia is actually more humane than passive since the patient will die in a matter of days in more agony through passive euthanasia.
What are Rachels objections to the principle of utility?
Explain Rachels’s objections to the utilitarian argument for active euthanasia. Objection to Principle of Utility—any action or social policy is morally right if it serves to increase the amount of happiness in the world or to decrease the amount of misery.
Is it ethical to euthanize your dog?
As with humans, the only time animal euthanasia is justified is if the animal is suffering as the result of a debilitating disease with little hope of full recovery.
Does the Catholic Church allow the removal of life support?
The basic Catholic principle about end-of-life health care is that “we have a duty to preserve our life and to use it for the glory of God, but the duty to preserve life is not absolute,” according to the “Ethical and Religious Directives for Catholic Health Care Services.” Therefore it is OK to “reject life-prolonging …
Can Catholics turn off life support?
Roman Catholic perspective: The Catholic church supports decisions to stop or not start life support treatment if treatment would be futile or overly burdensome. In these situations life support treatment is sometimes referred to as ‘extraordinary’.
What is James Rachels theory?
Rachels argued that the primary reason why cruelty to animals is wrong is because tortured animals suffer, just as tortured humans suffer. He held the view that inflicting pain on animals can sometimes be justified but we must have a sufficiently good reason for doing so.